Stenting versus Bypass Surgery for the Treatment of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

نویسنده

  • Seung-Jung Park
چکیده

Based on data comparing coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) with medical therapy, the current guidelines recommend CABG as the treatment of choice for patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can be selectively performed in patients who are candidates for revascularization but who are ineligible for CABG. Current evidence indicates that stenting results in mortality and morbidity rates compared favorably with those seen after CABG. Data from several extensive registries and a large clinical trial may have prompted many interventional cardiologists to choose PCI with stenting as an alternative treatment option for such patients. In addition, these data may inform future guidelines and support the need for well-designed, adequately powered, prospective, randomized trials comparing the two revascularization strategies.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

No More Debate Over Left Main Stenting Versus Bypass Surgery.

SEE PAGE 318 T raditionally, left main coronary artery disease had been regarded as a dominion of the cardiac surgeons on the basis of results from the classic trial comparing medical treatment and bypass surgery (1,2). However, several brave pioneers in interventional cardiology have continued to evaluate the performance of “less invasive” coronary stenting for the left main coronary artery st...

متن کامل

Acute and Long Term Outcomes of Coronary Intervention in Unprotected Left Main Lesions

Introduction : Significant left main coronary artery stenosis jeopardizes the entire myocardium of the left ventricle and has the worst prognosis of any form of coronary artery disease. Coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been considered as the standard therapeutic approach for such patients. There are limited data on the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PC...

متن کامل

Drug-eluting stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: are we ready to replace bypass surgery?

t has been five years since our last editorial in the Journal egarding the role of stenting in the treatment of unproected left main coronary artery disease. In the intervening ime, the landscape of coronary stenting has changed ramatically. In particular, the advent of drug-eluting stents DES) in mid-2003 has pushed the rate of clinical restenosis elow 5% for most lesion types (1,2). The effec...

متن کامل

How to optimize left main percutaneous coronary intervention.

Despite unfavorable outcomes in the early era of LMCA percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), interventionalists have continued attempting percutaneous treatment for LMCA stenosis (3). Technical advances in PCI and stent technology, particularly with the widespread availability of drug-eluting stents (DES), have led physicians to re-evaluate the role of PCI as a viable alternative treatment f...

متن کامل

Percutaneous coronary artery stenting of unprotected left main coronary artery disease using drug-eluting stents: the initial Baylor University Medical Center experience.

Significant narrowing of the left main coronary artery is a high-risk condition with significant mortality risk. Bypass surgery is the current gold-standard treatment for unprotected left main (ULM) disease. Stenting utilizing drug-eluting stents (DES) is another therapeutic option for patients with ULM disease considered too high risk for bypass surgery or for patients who simply refuse bypass...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 50  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009